No fault on your part and no apology needed or wanted by me..I was desperately trying to suss out what was happening in your column as I waded through a metric shit ton of emails so I was bit stressed that day…upon further review, I now see where I went wrong and I apologize to you for not seeing and comprehending the whole of your exposition that day…I emphatically state that there was NO chicanery on your part. I was not fooled. I just misread your piece in a rush to get my comments posted.
Late to the party here…have been wading through donation solicitations and various end-of the-year re-caps etc. etc..nevertheless, am so grateful to Hank who now appears to be, in addition, to a local treasure has become now a National Treasure, without exaggeration…
I can remember some e-mail correspondence with Hank from way back when when I invited him to speak to our local-affiliated political party and I said we usually give our speakers 1/2 hour with Q and A to follow and Hank’s response was then that he would prefer to give his Federal Reserve talk/exposition which would take approx. an hour and half…but at the time, I was not willing to alter our speaker format so I said maybe later on we could accommodate him but not just then..
So happy to see Hank’s perspicuity demonstrated here along with his ability to discern truths about the geopolitical landscape that we would otherwise be unaware of with our limited focus on own nation’s woes and tribulations…his wide-ranging focus back then and now helps me understand how the larger world works or in some cases, doesn’t…his ability in this domain is phenomenal and quite prescient…
Kudos to you, dude!
Finally I am curious how your talk to the Lanier Tea Party, ten years got elevated to where Tucker Carlson was able to take notice and highlight it for the rest of the world to see? Just a question but no pressure on you to answer, either way
Thanks for the kind comments. But, frankly, all you have to do is read the Substack to find out that Tucker's introduction, while accurate to be sure had they truly been for me, were actually for Ron Paul, who, evidently, ten years ago made numerous remarks about US involvement in Ukraine. I posted the entire introduction to Ron Paul at the end of the article. So, I apologize if you were fooled. My intention was not to fool, as I explain all this in the article, but instead to simply show how right I was ten years ago, when most people had no clue what our government was doing in Ukraine. And that is important to me because, when I might be so far out in front of, say, the common knowledge, people may not take seriously what I tell them, which is not good, for them, should I be telling them the truth, which is what I strive to do. I have been called everything in the book, not because I am wrong, but because I was right when the public was not ready to see it. That I saw all this so far before others, should add credence to what I tell people yet today. And that is why I wrote this Substack as I did, not to fool, but to demonstrate just how consistently credible I have been, now for well over a decade. I apologize if this came across any other way.
No fault on your part and no apology needed or wanted by me..I was desperately trying to suss out what was happening in your column as I waded through a metric shit ton of emails so I was bit stressed that day…upon further review, I now see where I went wrong and I apologize to you for not seeing and comprehending the whole of your exposition that day…I emphatically state that there was NO chicanery on your part. I was not fooled. I just misread your piece in a rush to get my comments posted.
That’s all it was.
So carry on and keep calm. (Note to Self)
Late to the party here…have been wading through donation solicitations and various end-of the-year re-caps etc. etc..nevertheless, am so grateful to Hank who now appears to be, in addition, to a local treasure has become now a National Treasure, without exaggeration…
I can remember some e-mail correspondence with Hank from way back when when I invited him to speak to our local-affiliated political party and I said we usually give our speakers 1/2 hour with Q and A to follow and Hank’s response was then that he would prefer to give his Federal Reserve talk/exposition which would take approx. an hour and half…but at the time, I was not willing to alter our speaker format so I said maybe later on we could accommodate him but not just then..
So happy to see Hank’s perspicuity demonstrated here along with his ability to discern truths about the geopolitical landscape that we would otherwise be unaware of with our limited focus on own nation’s woes and tribulations…his wide-ranging focus back then and now helps me understand how the larger world works or in some cases, doesn’t…his ability in this domain is phenomenal and quite prescient…
Kudos to you, dude!
Finally I am curious how your talk to the Lanier Tea Party, ten years got elevated to where Tucker Carlson was able to take notice and highlight it for the rest of the world to see? Just a question but no pressure on you to answer, either way
Once again, many thanks, Hank!
Thanks for the kind comments. But, frankly, all you have to do is read the Substack to find out that Tucker's introduction, while accurate to be sure had they truly been for me, were actually for Ron Paul, who, evidently, ten years ago made numerous remarks about US involvement in Ukraine. I posted the entire introduction to Ron Paul at the end of the article. So, I apologize if you were fooled. My intention was not to fool, as I explain all this in the article, but instead to simply show how right I was ten years ago, when most people had no clue what our government was doing in Ukraine. And that is important to me because, when I might be so far out in front of, say, the common knowledge, people may not take seriously what I tell them, which is not good, for them, should I be telling them the truth, which is what I strive to do. I have been called everything in the book, not because I am wrong, but because I was right when the public was not ready to see it. That I saw all this so far before others, should add credence to what I tell people yet today. And that is why I wrote this Substack as I did, not to fool, but to demonstrate just how consistently credible I have been, now for well over a decade. I apologize if this came across any other way.
Kudos on this long overdue recognition Hank.
Your spot on explanation of the Ukraine shenanigans is well deserving of a revisit. It was a fun listen.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1307696870646073