For as long as man has stared toward the heavens and wondered why, and subsequently charged his sciences with the responsibility of answering that question, the holy grail of that largely worthy discipline has been to discover the origin of life itself, of course assuming as a foundational aspect of that effort, that with no help from outside the physical world, "something," originally morphed out of "nothing." The built-in assumption regarding the scientific perspective on the origin of life is that "life" must have resulted naturally from "no-life." If that is true, then a verified, reproducible life-creation discovery could even, eventually, place science into a position of supervising that activity. If that is not true, then science ultimately has little to consider here.
Share this post
What Darwin and the Russian Collusion Theory…
Share this post
For as long as man has stared toward the heavens and wondered why, and subsequently charged his sciences with the responsibility of answering that question, the holy grail of that largely worthy discipline has been to discover the origin of life itself, of course assuming as a foundational aspect of that effort, that with no help from outside the physical world, "something," originally morphed out of "nothing." The built-in assumption regarding the scientific perspective on the origin of life is that "life" must have resulted naturally from "no-life." If that is true, then a verified, reproducible life-creation discovery could even, eventually, place science into a position of supervising that activity. If that is not true, then science ultimately has little to consider here.