“And I find it at least ironic that the Georgia Republican Party Executive Committee would withhold making the information about which I speak public, as the law demands, ostensibly due to fear that member's identities might be stolen, when they apparently have no problem that the identity of the entire Georgia Republican Party for which…
“And I find it at least ironic that the Georgia Republican Party Executive Committee would withhold making the information about which I speak public, as the law demands, ostensibly due to fear that member's identities might be stolen, when they apparently have no problem that the identity of the entire Georgia Republican Party for which they have been entrusted to execute policy, has been stolen, apparently complete with its Federal Tax ID#, and unlawfully assigned to a private, corporate entity, its donated funds apparently transferred to that entity without the permission of its contributors, its rules overwritten to effectively take on the identity of that corporate entity, the very executives to whom I refer now operating that private corporate entity, portraying those two unrelated entities, a political party under one title of law, to be one and the same with a corporation under a different title of law, while they hide the identities of the members of the governing committee of the former entity from each other so that none of them have the opportunity to discuss this situation outside of the setting of an executive session under Roberts Rules.”
“And I find it at least ironic that the Georgia Republican Party Executive Committee would withhold making the information about which I speak public, as the law demands, ostensibly due to fear that member's identities might be stolen, when they apparently have no problem that the identity of the entire Georgia Republican Party for which they have been entrusted to execute policy, has been stolen, apparently complete with its Federal Tax ID#, and unlawfully assigned to a private, corporate entity, its donated funds apparently transferred to that entity without the permission of its contributors, its rules overwritten to effectively take on the identity of that corporate entity, the very executives to whom I refer now operating that private corporate entity, portraying those two unrelated entities, a political party under one title of law, to be one and the same with a corporation under a different title of law, while they hide the identities of the members of the governing committee of the former entity from each other so that none of them have the opportunity to discuss this situation outside of the setting of an executive session under Roberts Rules.”
Possibly the longest sentence I’ve ever read.
And perfect grammar, if I do say so. Lol
😉