Thanks Hank for another great article. I wish more people in FoCo had your ideals. I have always heard that this county is run by the ‘good ole boy’ network, ever since I moved here. Everyone seems to know everything’s corrupt but no one seems to really want to do anything about it. I applaud you for your efforts and again, thanks for keeping the citizens informed.
That all persons involved seem to have no ethics, it is laughable that they try so hard to prove they do have such ethics! And then "prove" it in an unethical way. Thanks, Hank, again for your time and talent in exposing our county government.
Just re-stacked this article in the Notes section of my SubStack which also includes your previous article about this egregious violation of how the System, here in Forsyth County, is compromised and corrupt.
Thanking you, Hank for the follow- up and your attendance at the second hearing and especially the fact that you were able to confront, at least, one member of the “Ethics Panel” with a perfectly legitimate question that was answered in a dismissive way.
Thanks Hank for another great article. I wish more people in FoCo had your ideals. I have always heard that this county is run by the ‘good ole boy’ network, ever since I moved here. Everyone seems to know everything’s corrupt but no one seems to really want to do anything about it. I applaud you for your efforts and again, thanks for keeping the citizens informed.
That all persons involved seem to have no ethics, it is laughable that they try so hard to prove they do have such ethics! And then "prove" it in an unethical way. Thanks, Hank, again for your time and talent in exposing our county government.
Dream, dream I dream of you (them) in orange RICO suits.
Just re-stacked this article in the Notes section of my SubStack which also includes your previous article about this egregious violation of how the System, here in Forsyth County, is compromised and corrupt.
Thanking you, Hank for the follow- up and your attendance at the second hearing and especially the fact that you were able to confront, at least, one member of the “Ethics Panel” with a perfectly legitimate question that was answered in a dismissive way.